I think we all know someone who either has an addictive personality or is addicted to a habit forming substance. Merriam-Webster defines Addiction as:
1 : the quality or state of being addicted
2 : compulsive need for and use of a habit-forming substance (as heroin, nicotine, or alcohol) characterized by tolerance and by well-defined physiological symptoms upon withdrawal;
broadly : persistent compulsive use of a substance known by the user to be harmful
Addicted:
1 : to devote or surrender (oneself) to something habitually or obsessively
ed to gambling>2 : to cause addiction to a substance in (a person or animal)
There are many kinds of addictions. Jesse James, Tiger Woods and Clinton with their sex addiciton. All addictions are destructive, and disruptive in one way or another.
As a nurse I have seen my share of patients who have abused their bodies with the vast number of habit forming substances. I can't tell you how many patients I have nursed that have come through the ER doors and end up in ICU. These patients are usually on ventilators as a result of drug overdoses or as a result of their bodies being so abused from these substances, that it can no longer fight off the aliments that have bombarded their bodies.
We talk about the impact these substances have on the individual and the health care costs that are expended to treat addicted individuals. What we don't often openly talk about is the impact these addictions have on the people around the addict.
Let's just think about this for a moment. I recognize that addicts come from all walks of life. From the well to do families to the poverty stricken street person.
I use to think that circumstances played a large role in who would become an addict or had the potential to become an addict. But I am not sure of that anymore.
Again let's look at Jesse James and Tiger Woods for example. They have a huge support network. They have caring loving and supportive families, church networks, and even fellow workers. Yet their addiction controls them and almost destroyed them and their careers.
Addicts start to isolate themselves or only associate with people of like mind. The addicts with a stronger constitution somehow manage to maintain their social network, but for how long? They make themselves an outcast. They slowly remove themselves from the social network that is trying to support them. The families become overwhelmed by the addicts behaviours and feel lost, betrayed and even isolated as they feel they are the only families going through this. Some feel embarassed to let others know that they have a family memeber who is an addict. Addiction not only affects the addict but the family around them. Addiction is like a wildfire consuming and destorying everything in it's path.
Sometimes I wish I could get into the mind of an addict. What draws them to their demon. The demon that robs them of living their life to the fullest. The demon that makes relationships challenging. The demon that causes them to have extreme mood swings, and finally the demon who robs them of their physical health.
If genetics play a role then why do some family members become so inflicted when others are not? Science is helping us understand the chemical changes that occur in the brain as a result of substance abuse. Science is also investigating and helping us understand why some people have the addictive behaviours they display.
Unfortunately there is no cure for addiction. Drugs can help control cravings or behaviours, but they won't cure it. The only cure....is abstinence. A complete cessation of the demon that holds the addict hostage. Some folks have found AA to be of great assistance, others go to rehab programs or seek counselling. Some programs attempt to help the addict find the root of their addiction and teach them life skills. Ultimately...it's all about "you" the addict. What do you want? Do you want to beat the demon....can you find the internal fortitude needed to wake up each day and tell yourself "today I am not going to......."
We can point the finger for the causes of addiction. The legally advertised cigarettes with their carcinogenic addictive properties or the alcohol companies with their tantalizing spirits to the drug lords and politicians and their ill intended policies. But ultimately, don't we as individual have to take some responsibility for our own behaviours and choices regardless of our socioeconomic environment?